Traditional vs Agile Project Management

Traditional vs Agile Project Management

Project management is a constantly evolving field. PM is a proven method to increase productivity and streamline processes. It is a force to be reckoned with in today’s world. Although the ultimate goal of project managers is the same, the approach they take to achieving it may differ. Change is a time for a shift in attitude and a transformation of the way things are. There are two types of project managers when it comes to project managing: traditional project management or agile project management. Which one is better? Why should one choose one over the other and what will produce better results? Read on to find out the answers. The Differences: There is a key difference between the two methods. These are just a few. Structure

Traditional: This is the traditional structure for project management. This is also known as the waterfall approach. This management system ensures that all phases of a process occur in a sequential order. Each phase ends and the next begins. This ensures that all processes flow smoothly, much like a waterfall. It is well-structured and very linear. All phases are clearly defined, starting with the idea of a project, through its development, corrections, and delivery. Each stage must be completed before the next one can begin. Agile: Agile project management doesn’t follow a specific order. Agile project management favors an iterative, incremental approach. This case involves many development cycles and phases, which all operate simultaneously. The progress of any phase does not affect the start and end points of any phase. Complexity of the project

Traditional: This suits smaller projects or those with less complexity. This model is linear and can be affected by sudden changes or complexity. Sometimes, a little snag can force the team to go back and start over. Agile project management is best for complex projects. Complex projects may have many interconnected phases and one phase may depend on several others, as opposed to a single one in simple projects. These structures are more suited to agile methods, which are better able to adapt to them. They are therefore preferred for larger and more complex projects. Adaptability

Traditional: Traditional approaches are not flexible to sudden changes in plans. They assume that once a phase has been completed, it will not need to be re-evaluated. Traditional project management is not able to adapt to changes in client requirements or other unforeseen circumstances. You can’t just start over. This is a waste of time and effort. Agile: This method is flexible and adaptable because it is not linear. Complex projects often involve many interconnected phases. A change in one phase could have an impact on the next. Project managers can take calculated risks when managing complex projects because of their adaptability. You can expect feedback and changes.

Traditional: Every step of the project must be clearly defined from the beginning. This is because it cannot accommodate any major changes or feedback that might necessitate a modification in the process. Most often, the project budget and delivery time are set and cannot be changed. Agile: This method allows for high tolerance for change. This system is flexible and encourages feedback that can help improve the system.